A model for “AI”-relevant vulnerability

Abstract The recent growth in discussions of “artificial intelligence” has been accompanied by a proportional growth in the discussion of vulnerability of and to “artificial intelligence”. Meanwhile, the concept of vulnerability has not seen any deeper analysis adequate to capture all of the newly discussed phenomena. Popular conceptions of vulnerability either lack the necessary normative force to make it morally relevant, or they are limited to vulnerability to harms, which would exclude a range of entities that we would ordinarily consider to be vulnerable. To address these challenges, we propose a normative functionalist account of vulnerability: A system is vulnerable just in case it is sensitive to the disruption of its weakly valuable functions. We develop and defend this account, explicating what we understand by functions, their disruption, and how they are weakly valuable. We conclude by illustrating our account by applying it to a range of cases from the domain of “AI”-applications regarding individual agents, social institutions, and ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Journal of Philosophy
Published
2026-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-026-00456-2
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A model for “AI”-relevant vulnerability

Niël Henk Conradie, Jakob Ohlhorst
Asian Journal of Philosophy
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A model for “AI”-relevant vulnerability

Niël Henk Conradie, Jakob Ohlhorst
article en

Abstract

Abstract The recent growth in discussions of “artificial intelligence” has been accompanied by a proportional growth in the discussion of vulnerability of and to “artificial intelligence”. Meanwhile, the concept of vulnerability has not seen any deeper analysis adequate to capture all of the newly discussed phenomena. Popular conceptions of vulnerability either lack the necessary normative force to make it morally relevant, or they are limited to vulnerability to harms, which would exclude a range of entities that we would ordinarily consider to be vulnerable. To address these challenges, we propose a normative functionalist account of vulnerability: A system is vulnerable just in case it is sensitive to the disruption of its weakly valuable functions. We develop and defend this account, explicating what we understand by functions, their disruption, and how they are weakly valuable. We conclude by illustrating our account by applying it to a range of cases from the domain of “AI”-applications regarding individual agents, social institutions, and ecosystems.

Asian Journal of PhilosophyVol. 5(2)
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.