P1.027. Selective Fundoplication Approach in Hiatal Hernia Repair Reduces Reflux Recurrence and Reoperation Rates

Abstract Topic Benign Disease: Gastro-Esophageal Reflux and Hiatal Hernia Background Fundoplication is often performed during hiatus hernia (HH) repair to control reflux, but whether routine fundoplication improves long-term gastrointestinal outcomes remains uncertain. This study assessed the differences in the impact of routine and selective fundoplication approaches on symptomatic recurrence and reoperation rates after HH repair. Methods This retrospective, single-surgeon cohort study included 410 patients who underwent HH repair between February 2005 to October 2020. Patients who underwent HH repair prior to June 2014 routinely received fundoplication (non-selective era cohort; NSEC), whereas from June 2014 onwards, fundoplication was selectively performed (selective era cohort; SEC). Symptomatic recurrence rates, reoperation rates and cumulative rates were compared between the two cohorts. Statistical analyses consisted of Chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses. Results Median follow-up period of entire cohort was 32 months (IQR 3-78). The NSEC had significantly higher rates of symptomatic recurrence (p=0.027), reoperation (p<0.001), and cumulative reoperation (Log-rank p=0.002) compared to the SEC. Selective fundoplication and no fundoplication in the SEC were associated with lower hazard of reoperation compared to routine fundoplication (aHR 0.267, 95% CI 0.080–0.890, p=0.032; HR 0.402, 95% CI 0.176–0.919, p=0.031). Conclusion In this cohort, routine fundoplication did not prevent symptomatic recurrence. On the other hand, selective fundoplication approach achieves acceptable outcomes and lowers risk of reoperation. Selective fundoplication offered physiological benefit without exposing patients without reflux to unnecessary surgical complications. However, interpretation must account for surveillance bias. Further prospective studies with standardised pre- and post-operative assessment, and follow-up protocols are needed to confirm these results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diseases of the Esophagus
Published
2026-08-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doag077.175
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P1.027. Selective Fundoplication Approach in Hiatal Hernia Repair Reduces Reflux Recurrence and Reoperation Rates

Michael Talbot, Daniel Chan, Andrew Tse, Oliver Fisher et al.
Diseases of the Esophagus
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

P1.027. Selective Fundoplication Approach in Hiatal Hernia Repair Reduces Reflux Recurrence and Reoperation Rates

Michael Talbot, Daniel Chan, Andrew Tse, Oliver Fisher, Phue Pwint Hmwe
article en

Abstract

Abstract Topic Benign Disease: Gastro-Esophageal Reflux and Hiatal Hernia Background Fundoplication is often performed during hiatus hernia (HH) repair to control reflux, but whether routine fundoplication improves long-term gastrointestinal outcomes remains uncertain. This study assessed the differences in the impact of routine and selective fundoplication approaches on symptomatic recurrence and reoperation rates after HH repair. Methods This retrospective, single-surgeon cohort study included 410 patients who underwent HH repair between February 2005 to October 2020. Patients who underwent HH repair prior to June 2014 routinely received fundoplication (non-selective era cohort; NSEC), whereas from June 2014 onwards, fundoplication was selectively performed (selective era cohort; SEC). Symptomatic recurrence rates, reoperation rates and cumulative rates were compared between the two cohorts. Statistical analyses consisted of Chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses. Results Median follow-up period of entire cohort was 32 months (IQR 3-78). The NSEC had significantly higher rates of symptomatic recurrence (p=0.027), reoperation (p<0.001), and cumulative reoperation (Log-rank p=0.002) compared to the SEC. Selective fundoplication and no fundoplication in the SEC were associated with lower hazard of reoperation compared to routine fundoplication (aHR 0.267, 95% CI 0.080–0.890, p=0.032; HR 0.402, 95% CI 0.176–0.919, p=0.031). Conclusion In this cohort, routine fundoplication did not prevent symptomatic recurrence. On the other hand, selective fundoplication approach achieves acceptable outcomes and lowers risk of reoperation. Selective fundoplication offered physiological benefit without exposing patients without reflux to unnecessary surgical complications. However, interpretation must account for surveillance bias. Further prospective studies with standardised pre- and post-operative assessment, and follow-up protocols are needed to confirm these results.

Diseases of the EsophagusVol. 39(Supplement_1)
UNSW Sydney (AU), St. George Hospital (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.