COMPARATIVE PHARMACOGNOSTICAL ANALYSIS OF ROOT AND LEAF OF BHANDIRA (CLERODENDRUM INFORTUNATUM LINN.)

Introduction: Clerodendrum infortunatum Linn. (Bhandira; Family: Lamiaceae) is an important medicinal plant used traditionally in the management of bleeding disorders and inflammatory conditions. However, comprehensive Pharmacognostical standards for its root and leaf are limited. The present study was undertaken to establish pharmacognostical, phytochemical and HPTLC profiles of Bhandira for its authentication and standardization. Objective: To evaluate the Pharmacognostical characters, preliminary phytochemical constituents, and HPTLC profile of Clerodendrum infortunatum Linn. Materials and Methods: Roots and leaves of Clerodendrum infortunatum Linn. were collected from the natural habitats of Udupi district. Pharmacognostical, physicochemical, preliminary phytochemical and HPTLC analysis according to standard protocols. Results and Discussion: Comparative pharmacognostical evaluation of the root and leaf of Clerodendrum infortunatum Linn. revealed distinct macroscopic and microscopic characteristics useful for drug authentication. The root was cylindrical, greyish-brown, rough and fibrous, whereas the leaves were opposite-decussate, broadly ovate and pubescent. Microscopically, the root showed well-developed secondary xylem, sclereids and abundant calcium oxalate crystals, while the leaf exhibited a dorsiventral structure with abundant trichomes and a prominent bicollateral vascular bundle. Physicochemical analysis showed loss on drying of 0.21% and 4.74%, total ash of 6.11% and 9.60%, acid-insoluble ash of 4.37% and 0.74%, alcohol-soluble extractive of 0.03% and 5.32%, and water-soluble extractive of 12.61% and 18.52% for the root and leaf, respectively. Preliminary phytochemical screening revealed the presence of alkaloids, carbohydrates, steroids and triterpenoids in both parts, with saponins and resins present only in the root and tannins confined to the leaves. HPTLC analysis identified gallic acid and rutin in the root extract, whereas no specific constituents were confirmed in the leaf extract. Conclusion: The present study establishes diagnostic pharmacognostical and phytochemical standards for Bhandira, providing baseline data for its authentication, quality control, and future pharmacological and clinical investigations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
Published
2026-08-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21916327
Primary Topic
Pharmacology and Nanomedicine Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARATIVE PHARMACOGNOSTICAL ANALYSIS OF ROOT AND LEAF OF BHANDIRA (CLERODENDRUM INFORTUNATUM LINN.)

Dr. Mohammed Faisal2 Dr. Amritha S. A.*1
World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
Pharmacology and Nanomedicine Research
article

COMPARATIVE PHARMACOGNOSTICAL ANALYSIS OF ROOT AND LEAF OF BHANDIRA (CLERODENDRUM INFORTUNATUM LINN.)

Dr. Mohammed Faisal2 Dr. Amritha S. A.*1
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Clerodendrum infortunatum Linn. (Bhandira; Family: Lamiaceae) is an important medicinal plant used traditionally in the management of bleeding disorders and inflammatory conditions. However, comprehensive Pharmacognostical standards for its root and leaf are limited. The present study was undertaken to establish pharmacognostical, phytochemical and HPTLC profiles of Bhandira for its authentication and standardization. Objective: To evaluate the Pharmacognostical characters, preliminary phytochemical constituents, and HPTLC profile of Clerodendrum infortunatum Linn. Materials and Methods: Roots and leaves of Clerodendrum infortunatum Linn. were collected from the natural habitats of Udupi district. Pharmacognostical, physicochemical, preliminary phytochemical and HPTLC analysis according to standard protocols. Results and Discussion: Comparative pharmacognostical evaluation of the root and leaf of Clerodendrum infortunatum Linn. revealed distinct macroscopic and microscopic characteristics useful for drug authentication. The root was cylindrical, greyish-brown, rough and fibrous, whereas the leaves were opposite-decussate, broadly ovate and pubescent. Microscopically, the root showed well-developed secondary xylem, sclereids and abundant calcium oxalate crystals, while the leaf exhibited a dorsiventral structure with abundant trichomes and a prominent bicollateral vascular bundle. Physicochemical analysis showed loss on drying of 0.21% and 4.74%, total ash of 6.11% and 9.60%, acid-insoluble ash of 4.37% and 0.74%, alcohol-soluble extractive of 0.03% and 5.32%, and water-soluble extractive of 12.61% and 18.52% for the root and leaf, respectively. Preliminary phytochemical screening revealed the presence of alkaloids, carbohydrates, steroids and triterpenoids in both parts, with saponins and resins present only in the root and tannins confined to the leaves. HPTLC analysis identified gallic acid and rutin in the root extract, whereas no specific constituents were confirmed in the leaf extract. Conclusion: The present study establishes diagnostic pharmacognostical and phytochemical standards for Bhandira, providing baseline data for its authentication, quality control, and future pharmacological and clinical investigations.

World Journal of Pharmaceutical Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Pharmacology and Nanomedicine Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.