AI Chokepoint Geopolitics

Artificial intelligence is often portrayed as a contest of algorithms and model capabilities. This working paper argues that the strategic foundations of AI competition increasingly lie in control over compute infrastructure rather than software alone. Introducing the concept of AI chokepoint geopolitics, the paper examines how advanced semiconductors, cloud computing capacity, fabrication ecosystems, energy infrastructure, and export controls have become central instruments of geopolitical power. Drawing on evidence from organisations including the OECD, Stanford HAI, the World Bank, Reuters, and Nature, it explores how the concentration of AI infrastructure reshapes technological sovereignty, industrial policy, and strategic competition, particularly in the context of the United States, China, and Taiwan. The paper further considers the implications for the Global South, arguing that while AI adoption is becoming increasingly widespread, frontier AI development remains constrained by unequal access to compute resources. It concludes that AI should be understood not merely as a software revolution but as an industrial transformation in which control over computational infrastructure increasingly determines participation in the next generation of intelligent systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21250086
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Chokepoint Geopolitics

Karan Aggarwal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI Chokepoint Geopolitics

Karan Aggarwal
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence is often portrayed as a contest of algorithms and model capabilities. This working paper argues that the strategic foundations of AI competition increasingly lie in control over compute infrastructure rather than software alone. Introducing the concept of AI chokepoint geopolitics, the paper examines how advanced semiconductors, cloud computing capacity, fabrication ecosystems, energy infrastructure, and export controls have become central instruments of geopolitical power. Drawing on evidence from organisations including the OECD, Stanford HAI, the World Bank, Reuters, and Nature, it explores how the concentration of AI infrastructure reshapes technological sovereignty, industrial policy, and strategic competition, particularly in the context of the United States, China, and Taiwan. The paper further considers the implications for the Global South, arguing that while AI adoption is becoming increasingly widespread, frontier AI development remains constrained by unequal access to compute resources. It concludes that AI should be understood not merely as a software revolution but as an industrial transformation in which control over computational infrastructure increasingly determines participation in the next generation of intelligent systems.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Central Board of Secondary Education (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.