Empowering or Exploiting? The Implications of Direct Market Access for Improving Smallholder Farmers’ Welfare

Problem definition: Enabling market access is widely recognized as a priority for local governments aiming to reduce poverty among smallholder farmers. Traditional market access strategies, which connect farmers to wholesale intermediaries and reach consumers indirectly, have been criticized for exposing farmers to exploitation. Although it is commonly believed that enabling farmers to sell directly to consumers can mitigate this issue, farmers often rely on service intermediaries to facilitate direct sales and continue to face exploitation. Consequently, it remains unclear which type of market access strategy—indirect or direct—is more beneficial to smallholder farmers. We address this question by comparing representative strategies of the two types: contract farming, where farmers sell to a buying firm at a predetermined wholesale price, and rural livestreaming, where farmers sell directly to consumers via live broadcasts hosted by a media company that charges a percentage commission fee. Methodology/results: We construct game-theoretic models of the two strategies and compare farmers’ income in equilibrium. We show that, relative to contract farming, rural livestreaming can mitigate exploitation and improve farmers’ income for niche crops or crops with limited diseconomies of scale in planting, but may have the opposite effect for crops with mass appeal or steeply increasing marginal costs. Yield uncertainty can strengthen the relative advantage of rural livestreaming, whereas subsidies to farmers can weaken or even eliminate it. We validate our results via a case study of the market access strategies for smallholder farmers in Western China. Managerial implications: Policymakers should be mindful of the operational and market characteristics of local crops when choosing between direct and indirect market access strategies to improve farmers’ income. Moreover, coordination among poverty reduction instruments is important to avoid unintended consequences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Published
2026-08-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2024.1192
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Empowering or Exploiting? The Implications of Direct Market Access for Improving Smallholder Farmers’ Welfare

Yixin Lu, Luyi Gui, Lin Xi
2 citations
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
25.25
article

Empowering or Exploiting? The Implications of Direct Market Access for Improving Smallholder Farmers’ Welfare

Yixin Lu, Luyi Gui, Lin Xi
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Problem definition: Enabling market access is widely recognized as a priority for local governments aiming to reduce poverty among smallholder farmers. Traditional market access strategies, which connect farmers to wholesale intermediaries and reach consumers indirectly, have been criticized for exposing farmers to exploitation. Although it is commonly believed that enabling farmers to sell directly to consumers can mitigate this issue, farmers often rely on service intermediaries to facilitate direct sales and continue to face exploitation. Consequently, it remains unclear which type of market access strategy—indirect or direct—is more beneficial to smallholder farmers. We address this question by comparing representative strategies of the two types: contract farming, where farmers sell to a buying firm at a predetermined wholesale price, and rural livestreaming, where farmers sell directly to consumers via live broadcasts hosted by a media company that charges a percentage commission fee. Methodology/results: We construct game-theoretic models of the two strategies and compare farmers’ income in equilibrium. We show that, relative to contract farming, rural livestreaming can mitigate exploitation and improve farmers’ income for niche crops or crops with limited diseconomies of scale in planting, but may have the opposite effect for crops with mass appeal or steeply increasing marginal costs. Yield uncertainty can strengthen the relative advantage of rural livestreaming, whereas subsidies to farmers can weaken or even eliminate it. We validate our results via a case study of the market access strategies for smallholder farmers in Western China. Managerial implications: Policymakers should be mindful of the operational and market characteristics of local crops when choosing between direct and indirect market access strategies to improve farmers’ income. Moreover, coordination among poverty reduction instruments is important to avoid unintended consequences.

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
George Washington University (US), University of California, Irvine (US), Irvine University (US), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
25.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.